The candidacy question they answer too quickly
Most consultations in India run between 20 and 40 minutes. In that window, a doctor assesses your scalp, photographs your hairline, and tells you whether you are a candidate. What they rarely tell you is that candidacy has two separate components: whether you can have the procedure, and whether you will get meaningful results from it. A person with a Norwood scale grade VI pattern and limited donor density at the back of the scalp can technically undergo a transplant. The grafts will take. But the coverage achieved may be far below what the before-and-after wall suggests, because the donor supply simply does not stretch far enough. Ask specifically: how many grafts does my donor zone realistically yield, and how does that compare to the area I want covered? If the doctor gives you a number without examining the donor zone under magnification, that number is an estimate with a wide margin.
Indian hair types add a variable that consultations often skip past. Tightly coiled or wavy hair, common across South Indian and Bengali populations, provides more visual coverage per graft than straight hair, which changes the math on how many grafts you need. Curly hair also sits differently in the follicular unit, which affects extraction technique in FUE procedures. A clinic that does not mention your specific hair texture in the candidacy conversation is working from a template, not from your scalp.
What PRP actually is and what it is not
Platelet-rich plasma therapy has become a standard upsell at most hair clinics across Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Chennai. The pitch is consistent: PRP uses your own blood, spun down to concentrate growth factors, then injected into the scalp to stimulate follicles. A 2019 meta-analysis published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery reviewed 11 controlled studies and found that PRP produced statistically significant increases in hair density and thickness for patients with androgenetic alopecia, but with a critical qualifier. The response was strongest in patients who still had active, miniaturised follicles. In follicles that had already gone completely dormant, PRP showed no measurable effect. This is the sentence no consultation volunteers: PRP is a maintenance and stimulation tool, not a restoration tool. If your hairline has been receded for more than five or six years with no fuzz or vellus hair visible, PRP is unlikely to do what the brochure implies.
The protocol also matters. Three to four sessions spaced four to six weeks apart, followed by maintenance sessions every four to six months, is the evidence-supported approach. A clinic offering a single PRP session as an add-on to a transplant consultation, priced as a one-time treatment, is selling you a diluted version of the therapy.
The shedding phase, which is not a side effect, it is the process
Somewhere between two and six weeks after a hair transplant, the transplanted hair falls out. This is called shock loss or effluvium, and it is expected, but a significant number of patients in India report that their clinic mentioned it only briefly or not at all. The psychological impact of watching transplanted hair shed, after paying anywhere from Rs 40,000 to Rs 2.5 lakh depending on graft count and clinic tier, is real. Some patients interpret it as procedure failure and return to the clinic in distress. The follicle itself is intact beneath the scalp. The hair shaft sheds because the follicle enters a resting phase after the trauma of extraction and implantation. Regrowth typically begins between three and four months post-procedure, with final density visible closer to twelve to fourteen months. Any clinic that tells you results are visible at three months is describing early regrowth, not outcome.
The same shock loss can affect existing hair near the transplant zone. Native hair follicles under stress from the procedure can temporarily shed as well. This is less predictable and less commonly disclosed.
The cost conversation that does not happen
Quoted prices at Indian hair clinics are almost always per-session or per-procedure, not per-outcome. A transplant quoted at Rs 25 per graft sounds straightforward until you understand that the number of grafts recommended at consultation may be conservative, that touch-up sessions are common, and that PRP maintenance, if you want to preserve the transplanted result and slow loss in non-transplanted zones, adds a recurring cost of Rs 8,000 to Rs 20,000 per session depending on city and clinic. The total cost of a hair restoration plan over three years is typically two to three times the figure discussed at the first appointment. Ask for a written estimate that includes the recommended number of PRP maintenance sessions per year, the likelihood of a second transplant session given your current pattern, and the cost of any post-procedure medications such as minoxidil or finasteride that the clinic will recommend. These are not extras. They are part of the treatment plan.
Choosing a clinic in India: the question of accreditation
India has no single mandatory accreditation body governing hair transplant clinics the way hospitals are governed under the Clinical Establishments Act. The procedure is performed in settings ranging from NABH-accredited hospitals to standalone aesthetic clinics to what are effectively converted consultation rooms. The surgeon's qualification matters: a dermatologist or plastic surgeon with specific hair restoration training is not the same as a general practitioner who has completed a weekend certification course. The International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery maintains a member directory. The Association of Hair Restoration Surgeons India is another reference point. Neither membership guarantees outcome, but both require demonstrated training and peer review. Before booking, ask where the procedure will be performed, who will perform the extraction versus the implantation, in many clinics, the surgeon does the extraction and trained technicians do the implantation, and what the protocol is if you experience complications. The answer to that last question tells you more than any before-and-after photograph on the wall.
The gap between a reassuring first consultation and a result you are satisfied with is almost always filled by information the consultation did not offer. A transplant moves follicles permanently. PRP buys time for follicles that still have something to give. The decision about which one you need, or whether you need either, belongs to a conversation that takes longer than 40 minutes.