Millets Have a Lower Glycemic Index, But Portions and Cooking Methods Still Determine How Healthy They Are
Aishwarya Kapoor | Times Life Bureau | Sept 19, 2026, 07:02 IST
Millets Have a Lower Glycemic Index, But Portions and Cooking Methods Still Determine How Healthy They Are
Image credit : Times Life Bureau
Switching to millets is a reasonable dietary move, but the grain does not automatically fix anything. Glycemic response, antinutrients, and digestion all shift depending on how you prepare and portion millets. What the research on Indian diets actually shows is that cooking method and the quantity on your plate matter as much as the grain itself.
The Glycemic Index Claim Is Conditional
The glycemic index of pearl millet (bajra) sits between 54 and 68 depending on preparation. Finger millet (ragi) ranges from 68 to 79 in some preparations, higher than many people expect, and close to the range for parboiled rice. The number changes based on particle size, water absorption during cooking, and what the millet is eaten with. A ragi mudde eaten with a thin sambar delivers a different glycemic outcome than ragi flour stirred into sweetened milk.
Phytates and Antinutrients Are a Real Consideration
Soaking millets for 8 to 12 hours before cooking reduces phytate content by 20 to 30%. Fermentation, the process behind idli-style ragi preparations and traditional koozh in Tamil Nadu, reduces phytates further and also improves protein digestibility. Malting, used in commercial ragi powder products, is another effective method. These are not optional refinements. They are the difference between millets functioning as a nutritional grain and functioning as a fibre-heavy carbohydrate with blocked mineral uptake.
Portion Size Is the Variable Most People Ignore
Three bajra rotis eaten with ghee and no significant vegetable component deliver more calories than two wheat rotis with dal and a sabzi. The millet roti is not automatically the lighter option. Portions are the controlling variable, and the research supports this: the Frontiers in Nutrition meta-analysis noted that glycemic benefits in the studies it reviewed were most consistent when millet portions replaced, rather than added to, existing grain intake.
Cooking Methods That Change the Outcome
Cooking method compounds this. Pressure cooking millets until very soft breaks down resistant starch, reducing the fibre advantage. Cooking them to a slightly firm texture, the way traditional ambali or thick porridge preparations work, preserves more resistant starch and produces a slower digestive response. Popping or roasting millets, as in puffed jowar snacks, raises the glycemic index substantially. A puffed jowar snack marketed as a healthy grain alternative can have a glycemic response close to that of a puffed rice product.
Adding fat, ghee, coconut oil, or cold-pressed groundnut oil, to millet preparations does slow gastric emptying and moderates the glycemic response, but it also adds caloric density. The trade-off is worth understanding rather than assuming the fat is neutral.
The practical implication: soak whole millets before cooking, cook to a firm rather than mushy texture, pair with legumes or vegetables that add protein and fibre, and keep portions to the same size you would use for any other grain. The grain is genuinely useful. The assumption that switching to it is sufficient is what causes the problem.