Ind-Pak War Timeline: What Was Gained, What Was Lost, What Still Remains

Nidhi | May 03, 2025, 09:08 IST

From Partition to Kargil, India and Pakistan have fought four wars — each leaving behind victories, losses, and long shadows. This article breaks down what each conflict gained militarily, what it cost both sides politically and emotionally, and why the core issues remain unsettled even decades later.

We often ask who won a war. The more difficult question is: who paid the price for it? Between India and Pakistan, four major wars have shaped not only their borders but also their national identities, military priorities, and foreign policies.

Since 1947, every conflict has ended with claims of military success. Yet neither country has achieved the peace that should follow a victory. Instead, both have walked away carrying grief, grievance, and the heavy burden of what might have been. Below is a closer look at what each war delivered, what it destroyed, and why no side can truly call itself the winner.

1947–48: The First War and the Birth of the Kashmir Dispute

1947 war

( Image credit : Times Life Bureau )

Just months after Partition, Jammu and Kashmir — a Muslim-majority princely state with a Hindu ruler — became the epicenter of the first India-Pakistan war. As tribal militias from Pakistan invaded, the Maharaja chose to accede to India. The newly independent nations marched to war.
What followed:

Indian forces gained control of the Kashmir Valley — the heart of the region.
Pakistan held onto what is now Gilgit-Baltistan and parts of western Kashmir — now called PoK.
A UN-brokered ceasefire in 1949 froze the battle lines, creating the Line of Control (LoC).

What it cost:

Over 7,000 lives lost in the first war between brothers-turned-enemies.
Kashmir transformed from a political decision into an emotional identity issue.
A temporary ceasefire became a permanent standoff.
The seeds of one of the world's most intractable conflicts were planted — and watered with blood.

India claimed territorial control. Pakistan claimed moral victory by internationalizing Kashmir. But the valley itself became a hostage to history.

1965: The Second War and the Stalemate in the Shadows

1965 Ind vs Pak

( Image credit : Times Life Bureau )

Two decades after Partition, Pakistan believed the time was ripe to wrest Kashmir from India. Operation Gibraltar was launched to infiltrate forces into the region and trigger rebellion. It miscalculated. The rebellion never came. India responded with a full-scale assault across the Punjab border.
What followed:

India crossed the international border and advanced toward Lahore.
Pakistan countered in the Chamb sector in Jammu, leading to intense battles.
The war lasted 17 days — one of the largest tank battles since World War II.
The Tashkent Agreement restored pre-war boundaries.

What it cost:

Over 9,000 troops killed across both nations.
Cities shelled. Crops lost. Civilians displaced.
Pakistan’s strategy collapsed, and its military gained unprecedented political power.
India, though holding firm, realized its military vulnerabilities and began reforming.

No land changed hands. No grievance was resolved. But both nations grew more militarized and more mistrustful. The LoC may not have shifted — but the psychological line between peace and hostility deepened.

1971: The War That Redrew the Map of South Asia

Ind Pak War in 1971

( Image credit : Times Life Bureau )

This was not just a war between India and Pakistan. It was a war over identity, language, and representation. After Pakistan's eastern wing — present-day Bangladesh — faced brutal repression for demanding autonomy, a humanitarian crisis erupted. India was drawn in, first as a refuge, then as a liberator.
What followed:

Over 10 million Bengali refugees flooded into India, straining its economy and politics.
Pakistan’s crackdown in East Pakistan was labeled a genocide by global observers.
India launched a military offensive on December 3. Dhaka fell by December 16.
93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendered — the largest since WWII.

What it cost:

Pakistan lost half its population and territory — a psychological and geopolitical blow.
India emerged as the regional power — but at the cost of deepened hostility from the west.
Refugee camps turned permanent. Militancy in the Northeast surged.
The trauma of the loss defined Pakistan’s security doctrine for decades to come.

Bangladesh was born. For India, it was a rare, resounding military and moral victory. For Pakistan, it was a shattering identity crisis. But the euphoria faded. The Kashmir issue remained. And the road to reconciliation again dead-ended.

1999: Kargil and the War That Wasn’t Supposed to Happen

Kargil War

( Image credit : Times Life Bureau )

Just a year after both nations tested nuclear weapons — signaling a new era of deterrence — conflict returned in the form of deception. Pakistani soldiers, disguised as militants, occupied Indian posts in the Kargil sector of Ladakh. India was caught off guard but responded with ferocity.
What followed:

India launched Operation Vijay to evict intruders from strategic peaks.
Fierce high-altitude combat ensued — with air power used for the first time since 1971.
Global condemnation of Pakistan’s incursion mounted.
Under U.S. pressure, Pakistan withdrew.

What it cost:

Over 1,000 soldiers died on both sides — many in hand-to-hand combat at freezing altitudes.
India’s intelligence failure led to military overhaul.
Pakistan’s army chief deposed its civilian government within months.
International trust eroded, especially as Pakistan’s denials were disproven.

This was not a full-scale war — but it was a dangerous flirtation with nuclear escalation. The Kargil War proved that peace declarations mean little without military accountability.

The Real Question: What Was Truly Won?

On paper, India emerged stronger in three out of the four wars. More territory held. More military victories claimed. But the idea of "winning" begins to collapse when we look beyond borders.

Tens of thousands of lives have been lost, most of them young, many forgotten.
Refugee crises disrupted communities, especially in 1947 and 1971, with long-lasting demographic consequences.
Massive financial costs diverted attention from development, education, and poverty alleviation.
Kashmir remained unresolved, morphing into a militarized and politicized dispute.
Diplomatic progress has been consistently undermined, especially after brief moments of hope.

If war is a continuation of politics by other means, then every Indo-Pak conflict has shown that politics ultimately failed — before and after the battlefield.

And What Was Lost? Peace, Trust, and Possibility

The Line of Control. The unresolved status of Kashmir. Suspicion and surveillance. An arms race wrapped in nuclear red lines. A peace process that starts and stops with each regime.

Most of all, what remains is the idea that war is still possible — even thinkable — between two nations with so much shared history, culture, and pain.
Each war was a chapter in a story that could have gone differently.
Each ceasefire could have been the last.

And maybe the real victory will only come when neither side needs to win the next war.

Explore the latest trends and tips in Health & Fitness, Travel, Life Hacks, Fashion & Beauty, and Relationships at Times Life!