From Aryabhata to Aditya-L1: How Indian Astronomy Shaped ISRO and Where Indian Space Goes Next
Aishwarya Kapoor | Times Life Bureau | Sept 01, 2026, 07:57 IST
From Aryabhata to Aditya-L1: How Indian Astronomy Shaped ISRO and Where Indian Space Goes Next
Image credit : Times Life Bureau
Fifteen hundred years before ISRO launched its first satellite, an Indian mathematician named Aryabhata calculated the Earth's circumference to within one percent of the correct answer. The curiosity that drove him is the same thread running through Chandrayaan, Mangalyaan, and Aditya-L1. Indian astronomy was never lost, it just changed instruments. Here is what that unbroken line actually looks like.
The Number That Started Everything
The Aryabhatiya, the text he produced at age 23, also gave the world a workable value of pi (3.1416) and introduced the concept of zero as a positional placeholder. These were not philosophical musings. They were the tools of someone trying to predict eclipses accurately enough to be useful. Aryabhata was doing applied astronomy, and the application was the sky.
What the Medieval Observatories Were Actually Measuring
Jai Singh was not building monuments. He was correcting the existing astronomical tables, the Zij-i-Muhammadshahi, because he found them inaccurate for Indian latitudes. He commissioned translations of European astronomical texts, corresponded with Portuguese astronomers, and ultimately produced his own star catalogue, the Zij-i-Muhammad Shahi, in 1728. The Jantar Mantar network was a distributed measurement system, and it was calibrated to the same sky that Aryabhata had been calculating twelve centuries earlier.
ISRO and the Satellite That Carried the Name Forward
From that 1975 launch, ISRO's trajectory ran through the INSAT series, the IRS remote-sensing satellites, and then the missions that changed the global perception of what the agency could do. Chandrayaan-1, launched in 2008, carried the Moon Impact Probe and its instruments confirmed the presence of water molecules on the lunar surface, a finding that reshaped the scientific consensus on the Moon's geology. Mangalyaan, the Mars Orbiter Mission, reached Martian orbit in 2014 on its first attempt, making India the first country to succeed on a debut Mars mission. The total cost was approximately 450 crore rupees, less than the production budget of the Hollywood film Gravity, released the previous year.
What Aditya-L1 Is Actually Doing
The mission carries seven payloads. The Visible Emission Line Coronagraph studies the solar corona, the Sun's outer atmosphere, which is paradoxically hotter than its surface, reaching temperatures above a million degrees Celsius against a surface temperature of around 5,500 degrees Celsius. Why the corona is so much hotter than the surface below it is one of the genuinely open questions in solar physics. The Solar Ultraviolet Imaging Telescope maps solar ultraviolet radiation. The ASPEX and PAPA instruments measure solar wind particles and their energy distribution. This is the Sun as a system, not just a light source.
NASA's Parker Solar Probe, launched in 2018, flies through the corona itself, the closest any spacecraft has come to the Sun, reaching within about 6.1 million kilometres of the solar surface. Aditya-L1 and Parker Solar Probe are not competing. They observe from different vantage points and their data is complementary. Indian solar physics now contributes to the same body of knowledge that Parker is building.
Where the Line Goes From Here
The thread from Aryabhata's sidereal year calculation to Aditya-L1's corona observations is not a metaphor. It is a record of a specific kind of attention, the kind that asks what the sky is actually made of and refuses to treat the question as settled. Each generation inherited the instruments of the previous one, found them insufficient, and built better ones. The Jantar Mantar was built because the existing tables were wrong. The Aryabhata satellite was built because India had no eyes in orbit. Aditya-L1 was built because the Sun's corona was still unexplained. The pattern is not pride in the past. It is dissatisfaction with the present answer.