What RISAT and Cartosat Actually Watch and Why India Runs Two Separate Imaging Fleets
Aishwarya Kapoor | Times Life Bureau | Sept 05, 2026, 07:52 IST
What RISAT and Cartosat Actually Watch and Why India Runs Two Separate Imaging Fleets
Image credit : Times Life Bureau
India operates two entirely separate satellite imaging fleets, and the split follows the physics of light. RISAT satellites carry radar that punches through monsoon clouds and works at midnight. Cartosat satellites carry optical cameras that photograph the ground in sub-metre clarity. Together they cover what no single sensor can.
The cloud problem that forced a choice
This is why ISRO runs two distinct imaging fleets. The answer is not administrative convenience. It is physics. Optical sensors and radar sensors answer different questions about the same ground, and no single satellite design resolves that tension.
The Cartosat series solves the daylight, clear-sky problem. The RISAT series solves everything else.
What RISAT actually sees
RISAT-2, launched in 2009, carried an X-band SAR built in collaboration with Israel Aerospace Industries. X-band radar offers finer resolution, which is why RISAT-2 was placed primarily in a reconnaissance role. RISAT-1, launched in 2012, carried a C-band SAR and was designed with a wider aperture of applications: flood mapping, agricultural monitoring, and disaster assessment. RISAT-1A, launched in April 2022, is the current operational C-band satellite, with improved resolution and faster revisit times over the subcontinent.
SAR imagery reads differently from a photograph. Water surfaces appear very dark because they reflect microwave pulses away from the satellite. Rough terrain and man-made structures, buildings, bridges, military hardware, appear bright because they scatter energy back strongly. A trained analyst reads a SAR image the way a radiologist reads an X-ray: the logic of contrast is inverted from what the eye expects, but the information is precise. After the 2014 Jammu and Kashmir floods, RISAT-1 data was used to map inundated areas under cloud cover that grounded aircraft and blocked optical satellites entirely.
What Cartosat actually photographs
Cartosat-1, launched in 2005, carried a panchromatic camera with 2.5-metre ground resolution, enough to distinguish a large vehicle from a building. Each successive generation tightened that number. Cartosat-2, launched in 2007, reached 1-metre resolution. Cartosat-3, launched in November 2019, achieved 0.25-metre ground resolution, placing it among the sharpest civilian Earth-observation satellites operating anywhere in the world at the time of its launch.
At 0.25 metres, Cartosat-3 can image a parked car clearly enough to distinguish its roof from its shadow. That resolution makes the satellite directly useful for cadastral mapping, the precise delineation of land parcels that underpins property records across Indian states. It is also used for monitoring encroachments along forest boundaries, tracking urban sprawl in cities like Bengaluru and Pune where the built edge moves measurably between seasons, and updating road and drainage maps in areas where ground surveys are slow or dangerous.
Cartosat satellites operate in sun-synchronous orbits, crossing the equator at the same local solar time on each pass. This keeps lighting conditions consistent across images taken weeks apart, which matters enormously when analysts are comparing two images to detect change.
Where the two fleets work together
Crop acreage estimation, which feeds into the government's agricultural planning and the minimum support price mechanism, uses RISAT SAR data to track the extent of paddy cultivation under cloud cover during the kharif season, then cross-checks it against Cartosat optical data once the skies open. The two datasets correct each other. SAR can misread waterlogged fields as water bodies; optical imagery disambiguates. Optical imagery cannot see through haze over the Indo-Gangetic Plain in winter; SAR cuts through it.
After Cyclone Fani struck Odisha in May 2019, both satellite types were tasked within hours. RISAT data gave disaster managers a damage map before any aircraft could fly. Cartosat imagery, acquired as the storm cleared, provided the structural detail needed to prioritise which roads and bridges required immediate repair.
Why two fleets and not one
ISRO's decision to run parallel fleets is therefore an engineering conclusion, not a duplication of effort. The RISAT series and the Cartosat series are not doing the same job from different angles. They are measuring different physical properties of the same ground, and the ground requires both measurements to be understood completely.
The monsoon made that non-negotiable. A country that needs to watch its borders, map its crops, and respond to its disasters through four months of solid cloud cover cannot afford a fleet that goes blind when it rains. India's geography wrote the specification. ISRO built to it.